• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文OA文献 >Social contract for the internet community? Historical and philosophical theories as basis for the inclusion of civil society in internet governance?
【2h】

Social contract for the internet community? Historical and philosophical theories as basis for the inclusion of civil society in internet governance?

机译：互联网社区的社会契约？历史和哲学理论是将公民社会纳入互联网治理的基础？

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Netizens are affected by decisions taken with regard to Internet governance and should therefore be able to influence such. However, the heterogenity of Internet users requires special efforts in order to find a method of consensus building which includes all interested parties and creates the opportunity to make decisions acceptable for as large a part of the civil community as possible. Notwithstanding the fact that the Internet society is a newly emerging civil society, considerations taken into account in earlier contexts can lead to valuable lessons. In this respect, a theory which seems to offer a feasible approach encompasses the concept of a so-called “social contract” that is historically and philosophically addressing issues of civil society’s participation. Through the establishment of a civil society, each individual is protected by the whole of the community. The inclusion of civil society requires the implementation of a bottom-up process allowing responsiveness of the concerned actors in a rational discourse which improves democratic quality of the structures. Furthermore, each individual should be granted with the same rights and obligations in the sense of the same chance to development for everyone, in particular with respect to the use of freedom by having the social contract which secures the self-determination of all individuals. Furthermore, a new forum should be created which could realise appropriate fairness in all decision-making matters.
机译：网民会受到有关互联网治理的决策的影响，因此应该能够影响这一点。但是，互联网用户的异质性需要付出特殊的努力才能找到一种建立共识的方法，该方法应包括所有有关方面，并为尽可能多的民间团体接受决策提供机会。尽管互联网社会是一个新兴的公民社会，但在较早的背景下考虑这些因素仍可带来宝贵的教训。在这方面，一种似乎提供了可行方法的理论包含了所谓的“社会契约”概念，该概念在历史上和哲学上都涉及民间社会的参与问题。通过建立公民社会，每个人都受到整个社区的保护。民间社会的参与要求执行自下而上的程序，允许有关行为者以理性的话语作出回应，从而提高结构的民主质量。此外，就每个人的发展机会而言，应给予每个人相同的权利和义务，特别是在通过具有确保所有人的自决权的社会契约来使用自由方面。此外，应建立一个新的论坛，在所有决策事项上实现适当的公平。

著录项

  • 作者

    Weber, Rolf H; Weber, Romana;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号